Different Grades of Bitumen Explained: Types & Properties

Updated: December 31, 2025
Different Grades of Bitumen vary by grading system—penetration, viscosity, and performance grade—each linking binder properties to climate, traffic, and application. This guide explains what the numbers mean, compares major binder families (including PMB, oxidized grades, emulsions), and provides a buyer-focused framework to choose the right grade using real examples, COA checks, and a practical end-of-article checklist.
Different Grades of Bitumen are best understood by how they’re graded (penetration, viscosity, or performance) and what the numbers mean for heat, traffic, and durability. In simple terms: harder grades resist rutting in hot climates, softer grades reduce cracking in cold climates, and performance-graded binders fine-tune both for real pavement temperatures.

Why grades exist (and why “close enough” gets expensive)

Bitumen isn’t “one product.” It’s a family of binders engineered for different conditions. Pick the wrong grade and you typically see one of these outcomes within a season:
  • Bleeding / flushing in heat (binder too soft)
  • Rutting under slow heavy loads (binder not stiff enough at high temp)
  • Thermal cracking in winter (binder too stiff at low temp)
  • Raveling / moisture damage if adhesion and mix design aren’t matched

Different Grades of Bitumen: How grading systems work

Most specifications around the world fall into three core grading logics, plus a few specialty families.
Grading approach What it measures (in plain language) Typical grade format Best when you need… Common use-cases
Penetration grade “Hardness” at 25°C 50/70, 70/100, 35/50 Straightforward selection + wide availability Road paving, general asphalt mixes
Viscosity grade (VG) Flow resistance at set temps VG10, VG30, VG40 Better control than penetration in some specs Heavily used in South Asia; hot mixes
Performance grade (PG) Performance at actual pavement temperatures PG 64-22, PG 76-10 Climate + traffic-specific design Highways, airports, high-performance roads
Modified binders (PMB/CRMB) Enhanced elasticity/rutting/cracking resistance PMB grades vary by region Extreme traffic/temperature, longer life Expressways, bridges, intersections
Oxidized / Blown bitumen Higher softening point + lower penetration 115/15, 105/35 Waterproofing/industrial stability Membranes, roofing, pipe coating
Emulsions & cutbacks Workability at low temps, sprayability CRS/RS/SS, MC/RC/SC Cold application, tack, surface treatment Chip seal, tack coat, cold mix

1) Penetration grades (the most familiar “X/Y” grades)

Penetration is measured by how far a standard needle penetrates into the binder at 25°C under controlled conditions. Lower numbers = harder binder. Higher numbers = softer binder.

Common penetration grades and where they fit

(Exact offerings vary by standard and region; the pattern remains consistent.)
Pen grade Relative hardness Typical climate/traffic fit Real-world example
20/30 or 35/50 Hard Hot climates, heavy loads Industrial yards, heavy-duty base/binder layers
40/60 or 50/70 Medium-hard Warm to moderate climates Urban arterials, standard highways
60/70 or 70/100 Medium Moderate climates General-purpose asphalt mixes
80/100 or 100/150 Soft Cooler climates, lower rut risk Regions with colder winters, fatigue-sensitive surfaces
160/220+ Very soft Specialized cold applications / blending Used when extra flexibility is required

Mini tutorial: “Read” a penetration grade fast

  • If your pavement suffers summer rutting → move harder (lower penetration) or consider PG/PMB.
  • If your pavement suffers winter cracking → move softer (higher penetration) or consider PG with lower-temperature capability.
  • If traffic is slow and heavy (ports, bus lanes, climbs) → hardness alone may not be enough; modified binders often pay back.
Practical note for buyers: penetration alone doesn’t tell you how the binder behaves after aging or under repeated loading. That’s why many agencies are moving toward PG and MSCR-based specifications.

2) Viscosity grades (VG): simple procurement, better temperature control

VG systems classify bitumen by viscosity at specified temperatures (commonly including 60°C and/or 135°C). It’s often preferred where mixing/compaction temperatures and pumpability matter as much as “hardness.”
VG grade Relative stiffness Typical fit What it helps control
VG10 Softer Cooler climates or fatigue-sensitive layers Reduces low-temp cracking risk
VG30 General-purpose Most standard roads Balanced workability and stability
VG40 Stiffer Hot climates / heavy traffic Improves rut resistance
Buyer tip: if your plant struggles with workability (mix feels “tight” or needs too much heat), ask for the rotational viscosity and confirm the grade matches your production window.

3) Performance Grade (PG): the “climate + traffic” language

PG grading is built around pavement design temperatures, not just a single lab temperature. PG 64-22 is read like this:
  • 64 = high-temperature grade (resists rutting up to that pavement temp range)
  • -22 = low-temperature grade (resists thermal cracking down to that pavement temp range)

Quick selection logic (without overcomplicating it)

Use this as a starting framework—final selection should reflect local design guides and mixture design.
Situation Typical PG direction Why
Hot region + slow heavy trucks Higher first number (e.g., 70/76) Rutting happens when binder stays too soft
Cold winters / big night-day swings Lower second number (e.g., -28 / -34) Cracking is driven by stiffness and relaxation
High RAP content Often needs careful balancing RAP stiffens binder; grade choice must account for it
Intersections, climbs, bus lanes Consider MSCR/traffic-based specs Repeated high shear loads punish “standard” binders

Trend that matters right now: MSCR and traffic-focused grading

Many road owners increasingly require rutting performance verified under repeated stress, especially for modified binders. This is where MSCR-based approaches (and traffic categories) become important in procurement, not just mix design.

Polymer Modified Bitumen (PMB): when standard grades aren’t enough

PMB adds polymers (commonly elastomeric types like SBS) or other modifiers to improve:
  • Elastic recovery (better crack resistance and deformation recovery)
  • High-temperature rut resistance
  • Durability under aging and repeated loading

When PMB is usually worth the premium

  • Expressways with heavy freight corridors
  • Airports and industrial pavements
  • Bridges (thermal movement + cracking sensitivity)
  • Thin overlays (higher strain; needs better fatigue resistance)
  • Extreme climates (very hot summers or harsh winters)

Case example: “Hot-climate rutting problem at a logistics hub”

A logistics yard using a standard mid-grade paving bitumen saw wheel-path depressions during peak summer with slow-moving loaded trucks. Upgrading to a higher-performance binder family (PG/PMB depending on spec) plus verifying compaction and air void targets reduced permanent deformation risk without needing excessive binder reduction (which can cause raveling). Procurement note: PMB performance depends on compatibility, storage stability, and proper handling temperatures. Always request a COA with the performance tests your spec recognizes.

Oxidized (blown) bitumen grades: built for waterproofing and industrial stability

Oxidized grades are commonly expressed like 115/15:
  • 115 ≈ softening point (Ring & Ball, °C)
  • 15 ≈ penetration (hardness)
These grades are engineered to be more heat-stable and less temperature-susceptible for non-paving uses.
Oxidized grade Typical behavior Common uses
115/15 Very high softening point, very hard Roofing membranes, industrial waterproofing
105/35 High softening point, less hard General waterproofing, coatings
95/25 (varies by market) Balanced Damp-proofing, adhesives, protective layers
Real example: torch-on membranes often rely on oxidized grades because they hold shape on hot roofs and resist flow.

Emulsions and cutbacks: for cold application and spray work

These are “application-focused” grades.

Emulsions (water-based)

Used for tack coats, chip seals, slurry/micro surfacing, and some cold mixes. Key choices include:
  • Setting speed: rapid / medium / slow
  • Charge type: cationic or anionic (depends on aggregates and chemistry)

Cutbacks (solvent-based)

Cutbacks improve low-temperature workability, but many markets limit them due to VOC emissions—so emulsions and warm-mix approaches are increasingly preferred.
Family Best for Watch-outs
Emulsions Safer handling, lower VOC, widespread use Need correct breaking/setting behavior on site
Cutbacks Cold weather workability Regulatory limits, drying time, emissions

How to choose the right grade: a buyer-first framework

Use this if you’re purchasing for projects, tenders, or long-term supply agreements.

Step 1: Lock the application

  • Hot mix asphalt (surface, binder course, base)
  • Surface treatment (chip seal, tack coat, fog seal)
  • Waterproofing / industrial (membranes, coatings, pipe)

Step 2: Match climate + traffic

  • Hot + slow heavy loads → rutting risk dominates
  • Cold + large temperature swings → cracking risk dominates
  • High RAP → stiffness increases; binder choice must compensate

Step 3: Choose the grading system your spec requires

  • Penetration or VG → common procurement simplicity
  • PG / MSCR-based → performance under real conditions

Step 4: Confirm the must-have properties

Here’s a practical selection matrix.
Use-case Safer starting family Properties to prioritize on COA
Standard roads (moderate climate) Penetration mid-grade or VG30 Penetration/viscosity, softening point, flash point, solubility
Hot-climate highways Harder pen grade or higher PG High-temp rut resistance indicators, viscosity, aging response
Cold regions / crack-prone overlays Softer family or lower-temp PG Low-temp cracking resistance indicators, ductility/relaxation behavior
Intersections / bus lanes / ports PG with traffic focus or PMB Rut resistance under repeated load, elastic recovery (where specified)
Roofing membranes Oxidized/blown Softening point, penetration, brittleness behavior, consistency
Tack coat / chip seal Emulsion family Setting behavior, residue properties, adhesion compatibility

Step 5: Validate logistics and handling (this prevents quality disputes)

  • Confirm loading temperature and safe heating limits
  • Ensure tank cleanliness (water and diesel contamination are common culprits)
  • Agree on sampling method and dispute protocol (retain samples)

Mini tutorial: how to read a COA (Certificate of Analysis) like a pro

When comparing suppliers or shipments, scan in this order:
  1. Spec reference (which standard and grade?)
  2. Consistency (penetration or viscosity, depending on grading system)
  3. Softening point (helps predict heat sensitivity)
  4. Aging-related results (if included—very important for durability)
  5. Flash point & solubility (safety + purity)
  6. Homogeneity notes (especially for PMB; separation risk matters)
Red flag pattern: a binder that meets penetration but shows weak aging performance or inconsistent viscosity across batches.

Common field problems and what the grade usually has to do with it

  • Rutting: binder too soft at high temperature, or traffic loads exceed design → move to higher-performance family (PG/PMB) and review mix design.
  • Bleeding/flushing: excess binder, low air voids, or soft binder → confirm grade, gradation, and compaction.
  • Thermal cracking: binder too stiff at low temperature → select lower-temperature PG or softer family; consider mix design adjustments.
  • Raveling: binder content too low, poor adhesion, or aging → check binder selection, additives, and aggregate quality.

Executive Summary checklist (use this before you buy or specify)

  • I know the application (HMA, surface treatment, waterproofing, industrial).
  • I matched climate and traffic to the grade family (rutting vs cracking risk).
  • I selected the correct grading system required by the project spec (Pen/VG/PG/MSCR).
  • I defined the critical properties to verify on the COA (not just the grade label).
  • I confirmed handling limits (loading temps, storage stability, contamination controls).
  • I aligned sampling, testing, and dispute procedures with the contract.
Conclusion: Choosing Different Grades of Bitumen is not about memorizing numbers—it’s about aligning grading logic, climate, traffic, and application so the binder performs predictably from plant to pavement (or from drum to waterproofing layer).

FAQ

1) Is 50/70 always better than 70/100 for roads?

Not always. 50/70 is typically harder and can resist rutting better in warm conditions, but in colder climates it may increase cracking risk. The “better” choice depends on climate, traffic speed, and mix design.

2) What does PG 64-22 actually guarantee?

It indicates the binder meets performance requirements at a high pavement temperature around 64 and a low pavement temperature around -22 (per the grading framework). It doesn’t replace mix design or construction quality control.

3) When should I choose PMB instead of a standard paving grade?

Choose PMB when you face heavy traffic, slow loads, extreme temperatures, thin overlays, or cracking/rutting history. PMB often reduces lifecycle cost when failures are otherwise frequent.

4) Can I switch grades to solve rutting without changing the mix design?

Sometimes, but it’s risky. Rutting is influenced by binder grade, aggregate structure, air voids, and compaction. Grade upgrades work best when paired with mix verification and field compaction control.

5) What grade is best for waterproofing membranes?

Oxidized/blown bitumen grades are commonly used because they offer higher softening points and dimensional stability. The exact grade should match the membrane formulation and the service temperature range.

Sources

  • ASTM D946/D946M — Penetration-graded asphalt cement specification used widely for paving-grade classification: ASTM D946/D946M
  • ASTM D6373 — Performance-graded asphalt binder framework that ties grade to pavement design temperatures: ASTM D6373
  • AASHTO M 332 — MSCR-based performance grading that adds traffic loading considerations for rutting performance: AASHTO M 332
  • NEN-EN 12591:2009 — European framework for specifications and test methods for paving grade bitumens: NEN-EN 12591
  • FHWA LTPPBind Online User Guide — Practical guidance for selecting PG binders using climatic models and reliability concepts: FHWA LTPPBind Guide

Explore more posts related to the topic or product(s) mentioned, categorized under this tag:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *